Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1976

reference
14-tree-1
name
1976
tree-preservation-order

undefined

14-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.935379 50.865765)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.935322 50.865759,-0.935325 50.865771,-0.935333 50.865781,-0.935345 50.865789,-0.935361 50.865794,-0.935378 50.865796,-0.935396 50.865794,-0.935412 50.865789,-0.935425 50.865782,-0.935433 50.865772,-0.935436 50.865760,-0.935434 50.865749,-0.935426 50.865739,-0.935413 50.865731,-0.935398 50.865726,-0.935380 50.865724,-0.935363 50.865726,-0.935347 50.865731,-0.935334 50.865738,-0.935326 50.865748,-0.935322 50.865759)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL